Madagascar vs Mozambique: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)

Madagascar
17,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
19,586 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
156th
Mozambique rank
155th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) over time

  • Madagascar
  • Mozambique
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 19,586 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 17,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 1,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 156th and Mozambique ranks 155th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 8,428 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,921 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,508 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 11,148 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,858 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 14,254 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,175 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,079 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 17,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,523 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 494.52 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015), Madagascar or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 19,586 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 17,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) between Madagascar and Mozambique?
1,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mozambique?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Mozambique rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)?
Madagascar ranks 156th and Mozambique ranks 155th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Mozambique: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/mozambique/">Madagascar vs Mozambique: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 8,377 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.