Lower middle income vs Luxembourg: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

Lower middle income
324,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg
24.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income rank
9th
Luxembourg rank
9th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Luxembourg
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 24.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 324,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 24.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 75.9 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Lower middle income ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 9th of 32 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 130,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16.55 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 229,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20.86 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2020s 299,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, Lower middle income or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 24.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 324,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between Lower middle income and Luxembourg?
24.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Luxembourg rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
Lower middle income ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 9th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Luxembourg: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/luxembourg/">Lower middle income vs Luxembourg: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.