Curaçao vs Low & middle income: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Curaçao
8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Low & middle income
490,884 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
22nd
Low & middle income rank
20th
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Curaçao
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre against 490,884 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 8.34 million current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Curaçao's figure about 18.0 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.
Curaçao ranks 22nd and Low & middle income ranks 20th of 183 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Curaçao or Low & middle income?
- Curaçao, at 8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre against 490,884 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Curaçao and Low & middle income?
- 8.34 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Low & middle income?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curaçao and Low & middle income rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Curaçao ranks 22nd and Low & middle income ranks 20th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.