Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
99,858 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
34th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
36th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre against 99,858 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 3.44 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 35.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 183 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 176,188 current US$ per square kilometre 15,755 current US$ per square kilometre 160,433 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 315,776 current US$ per square kilometre 23,564 current US$ per square kilometre 292,212 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 566,065 current US$ per square kilometre 41,451 current US$ per square kilometre 524,614 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 1.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 78,986 current US$ per square kilometre 1.64 million current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 3.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 92,828 current US$ per square kilometre 3.33 million current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Bangladesh, at 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre against 99,858 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa?
3.44 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sub-saharan-africa/">Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.