Madagascar vs Namibia: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Madagascar
24,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
20,366 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
151st
Namibia rank
154th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Madagascar
  • Namibia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 24,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,366 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 4,534 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.

Madagascar ranks 151st and Namibia ranks 154th of 160 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 10,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,269 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 11,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,160 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 16,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,350 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,681 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 20,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 24,139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,656 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Madagascar or Namibia?
Madagascar, at 24,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,366 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Madagascar and Namibia?
4,534 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Madagascar ranks 151st and Namibia ranks 154th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Namibia: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/namibia/">Madagascar vs Namibia: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.