Europe & Central Asia vs Qatar: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia
831,150 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
11.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Europe & Central Asia rank
13th
Qatar rank
16th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Qatar
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M197019962023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 11.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 831,150 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 10.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 14.1 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 13th and Qatar ranks 16th of 41 groups.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 535,634 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 834,906 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2000s 643,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2010s 730,557 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9.79 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 749,153 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia or Qatar?
Qatar, at 11.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 831,150 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia and Qatar?
10.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Qatar?
25 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Qatar rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 13th and Qatar ranks 16th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Qatar: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/qatar/">Europe & Central Asia vs Qatar: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.