Low income vs Mongolia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Low income
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 28.0% against 19.9% in Low income, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mongolia ahead.
Low income ranks 39th and Mongolia ranks 40th of 43 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.3% | 30.6% | 8.3% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 26.8% | 5.3% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Low income or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 28.0% against 19.9% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Low income and Mongolia?
- 8.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Low income and Mongolia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Low income ranks 39th and Mongolia ranks 40th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.