Poland vs Chinese Taipei: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and

Poland
24,416 US dollars, PPP converted
in 2023
Chinese Taipei
65,085 US dollars, PPP converted
in 2024
Poland rank
5th
Chinese Taipei rank
4th

Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and over time

  • Poland
  • Chinese Taipei
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072024

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 65,085 US dollars, PPP converted against 24,416 US dollars, PPP converted in Poland, a difference of 40,669 US dollars, PPP converted.

That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 2.7 times Poland's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 5th and Chinese Taipei ranks 4th of 12 countries.

Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2000s 6,080 US dollars, PPP converted 25,694 US dollars, PPP converted 19,614 US dollars, PPP converted Chinese Taipei
2010s 11,637 US dollars, PPP converted 36,101 US dollars, PPP converted 24,464 US dollars, PPP converted Chinese Taipei
2020s 21,783 US dollars, PPP converted 55,770 US dollars, PPP converted 33,987 US dollars, PPP converted Chinese Taipei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic expenditure on r&d by sector of performance and, Poland or Chinese Taipei?
Chinese Taipei, at 65,085 US dollars, PPP converted against 24,416 US dollars, PPP converted in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross domestic expenditure on r&d by sector of performance and between Poland and Chinese Taipei?
40,669 US dollars, PPP converted, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Chinese Taipei?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Poland and Chinese Taipei rank globally for gross domestic expenditure on r&d by sector of performance and?
Poland ranks 5th and Chinese Taipei ranks 4th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and socio-economic objectives — Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Chinese Taipei: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-expenditure-on-r-and-d-by-sector-of-performance-and-socio-economic/poland-2/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-expenditure-on-r-and-d-by-sector-of-performance-and-socio-economic/poland-2/taiwan/">Poland vs Chinese Taipei: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and socio-economic objectives — Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD)
Unit
US dollars, PPP converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,166 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This table contains data on Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) by socio-economic objective (SEO), using the NABS 2007 classification i.e.: Exploration and exploitation of the Earth, Environment, Exploration and exploitation of space, Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures, Energy, Industrial production and technology, Health, Agriculture, Education, Culture, recreation, religion and mass media, Political and social systems, structures and processes, General advancement of knowledge, and Defence.