Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
271,600 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
234,524 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
64th
New Zealand rank
67th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • New Zealand
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 271,600 current US$ per square kilometre against 234,524 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 37,076 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 64th and New Zealand ranks 67th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 10,064 current US$ per square kilometre 13,048 current US$ per square kilometre 2,984 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 19,906 current US$ per square kilometre 27,979 current US$ per square kilometre 8,073 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 42,701 current US$ per square kilometre 45,142 current US$ per square kilometre 2,441 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 87,191 current US$ per square kilometre 87,781 current US$ per square kilometre 590.18 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 195,080 current US$ per square kilometre 162,662 current US$ per square kilometre 32,418 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 236,602 current US$ per square kilometre 229,184 current US$ per square kilometre 7,418 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
Costa Rica, at 271,600 current US$ per square kilometre against 234,524 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
37,076 current US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 64th and New Zealand ranks 67th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/new-zealand/">Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.