Belarus vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Belarus
88,237 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
79,939 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
101st
Iceland rank
103rd

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 88,237 current US$ per square kilometre against 79,939 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 8,298 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 101st and Iceland ranks 103rd of 184 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 21,280 current US$ per square kilometre 15,634 current US$ per square kilometre 5,646 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 48,325 current US$ per square kilometre 36,300 current US$ per square kilometre 12,025 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 101,540 current US$ per square kilometre 36,187 current US$ per square kilometre 65,353 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 83,361 current US$ per square kilometre 63,864 current US$ per square kilometre 19,497 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Belarus or Iceland?
Belarus, at 88,237 current US$ per square kilometre against 79,939 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Belarus and Iceland?
8,298 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 101st and Iceland ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/iceland/">Belarus vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.