Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Low & middle income
308,589 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
5.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
20th
Mauritius rank
22nd

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Mauritius
02.0M4.0M6.0M197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 5.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 308,589 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 5.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 18.1 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 42 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 89,170 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.53 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 128,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 217,598 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 284,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Low & middle income or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 5.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 308,589 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Low & middle income and Mauritius?
5.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Mauritius?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Mauritius rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Low & middle income ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/mauritius/">Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.