Korea vs Upper middle income: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Korea
12.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income
420,831 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea rank
14th
Upper middle income rank
16th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Korea
  • Upper middle income
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Korea currently reports 12.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 420,831 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 12.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Korea's figure about 29.7 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 14th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 169 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 5.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 115,181 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Korea
2000s 7.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 167,530 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Korea
2010s 10.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 294,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Korea
2020s 11.93 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 388,082 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Korea or Upper middle income?
Korea, at 12.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 420,831 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Korea and Upper middle income?
12.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Upper middle income?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Korea and Upper middle income rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Korea ranks 14th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Upper middle income: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/upper-middle-income/">Korea vs Upper middle income: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.