East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.0% against 2.7% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.8 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 47 groups.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4% | 12.3% | 7.8% | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4.5% | 8.5% | 4.0% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 4.7% | 1.6% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2.8% | 5.2% | 2.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.0% against 2.7% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kazakhstan?
- 2.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kazakhstan?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.