Equatorial Guinea vs Upper middle income: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 13.2% against 5.5% in Upper middle income, a difference of 7.7%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.4 times Upper middle income's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Upper middle income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 858.5% | 8.9% | 849.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -2.1% | 3.9% | 6.0% | Upper middle income |
| 2020s | 3.2% | 1.6% | 1.6% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Upper middle income?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 13.2% against 5.5% in Upper middle income as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Upper middle income?
- 7.7%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Upper middle income?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Upper middle income rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.