Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile

Chile: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre was 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2017)
63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.6%
World rank
150th
of 178 countries
All-time high
129.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
All-time low
1.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
57
1961–2017

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2017

050100150196119892017

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Chile is 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2017.

That represents a change of up 2.6% on the previous year and up 2.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 129.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 1.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Chile 150th out of 178 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile, 1961 to 2017.
Year BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Change
1961 1.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre —
1962 3.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +75.5%
1963 2.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -19.9%
1964 4.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +60.7%
1965 4.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +5.0%
1966 18.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +315.0%
1967 19.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +1.6%
1968 12.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -33.8%
1969 18.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +42.4%
1970 24.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +36.5%
1971 24.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -0.6%
1972 22.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -6.8%
1973 25.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +10.8%
1974 24.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -3.0%
1975 31.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +27.4%
1976 28.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -10.5%
1977 37.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +34.7%
1978 32.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -15.2%
1979 42.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +31.5%
1980 48.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +16.3%
1981 44.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -9.1%
1982 40.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -9.7%
1983 39.25 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -2.4%
1984 31.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -20.8%
1985 41.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +33.1%
1986 49.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +20.2%
1987 68.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +37.4%
1988 69.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +1.7%
1989 67.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -3.3%
1990 88.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +32.3%
1991 106.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +19.4%
1992 121.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +14.2%
1993 117.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -2.9%
1994 115.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -1.5%
1995 129.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +11.3%
1996 115.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -10.4%
1997 103.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -10.1%
1998 98.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -5.0%
1999 83.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -15.7%
2000 74.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -10.3%
2001 75.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +0.6%
2002 61.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -17.9%
2003 76.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +24.4%
2004 86.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +13.0%
2005 79.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -8.4%
2006 68.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -13.7%
2007 61.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -9.8%
2008 83.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +34.7%
2009 92.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +11.0%
2010 88.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -4.4%
2011 74.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -15.5%
2012 87.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +16.9%
2013 79.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -9.4%
2014 76.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -3.9%
2015 55.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -26.4%
2016 61.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +10.3%
2017 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre +2.6%

Chile compared with similar countries

  • Chile's 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 612.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, 10% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
  • Chile's 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 218.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, 29% of the median. (37 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1966 +315.0% 4.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 9.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 29.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 42.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 50.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 31.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 69.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 108.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 83.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 129.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 76.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 61.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 92.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 73.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 55.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 88.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 147 Algeria 78.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 148 Peru 77.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 149 Uruguay 71.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 151 Equatorial Guinea 60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 152 Paraguay 60.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 153 Namibia 60.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 179 places →

More economy & growth data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Chile?
Technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Chile was 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 129.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
What is the lowest technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 1.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Chile rank for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 150th out of 178 countries with data for 2017.
Is technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/">Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Chile</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.