Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Equatorial Guinea
60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
150th
Equatorial Guinea rank
151st

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Equatorial Guinea
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Chile ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 178 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 31.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 30.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 50.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 227.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 177.44 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 108.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 594.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 486.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 76.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 417.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 341.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 73.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 180.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 106.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?
Chile, at 63.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2017.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
2.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
45 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2017.
How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/equatorial-guinea/">Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.