Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre was 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
170,093 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 7.8%
World rank
56th
of 195 countries
All-time high
170,093 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
1,749 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Dominican Republic recorded 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 7.8% on the previous year and up 101.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic peaked at 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Dominican Republic 56th out of 195 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,772 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2,269 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1963 | 2,467 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1964 | 2,743 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1965 | 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 1966 | 2,418 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 1967 | 2,482 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1968 | 2,852 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1969 | 3,126 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1970 | 3,316 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1971 | 3,736 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1972 | 4,246 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1973 | 4,732 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1974 | 8,230 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 1975 | 8,944 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1976 | 7,992 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1977 | 9,304 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1978 | 8,342 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1979 | 9,431 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1980 | 10,495 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1981 | 11,198 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1982 | 9,791 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1983 | 11,882 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1984 | 16,332 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1985 | 9,830 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 1986 | 11,526 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1987 | 8,741 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1988 | 8,062 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1989 | 10,031 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1990 | 10,982 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1991 | 14,455 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1992 | 19,914 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 1993 | 22,363 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1994 | 24,113 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1995 | 28,279 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1996 | 27,974 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1997 | 33,181 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1998 | 38,888 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1999 | 38,341 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2000 | 47,670 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 2001 | 49,338 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2002 | 46,802 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2003 | 27,741 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 2004 | 27,839 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2005 | 49,995 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.6% |
| 2006 | 50,430 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 72,881 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 2008 | 68,019 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2009 | 69,133 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2010 | 74,990 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2011 | 76,022 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 78,745 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2013 | 84,493 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2014 | 87,857 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2015 | 102,489 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2016 | 110,731 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2017 | 118,607 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2018 | 130,921 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2019 | 136,003 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2020 | 107,358 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2021 | 139,891 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 2022 | 157,766 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2023 | 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,431 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,126 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 6,827 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,316 current US$ per square kilometre | 9,431 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 10,789 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,062 current US$ per square kilometre | 16,332 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 25,849 current US$ per square kilometre | 10,982 current US$ per square kilometre | 38,888 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 50,985 current US$ per square kilometre | 27,741 current US$ per square kilometre | 72,881 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 100,086 current US$ per square kilometre | 74,990 current US$ per square kilometre | 136,003 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 143,777 current US$ per square kilometre | 107,358 current US$ per square kilometre | 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 53 Bahamas 194,745 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 54 Tuvalu 187,298 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 55 El Salvador 185,004 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 57 Türkiye 164,075 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Sweden 151,629 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 59 Dominica 147,867 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Dominican Republic
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.27 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Total reserves minus gold (current US$), annual growth rate 9.5 % change on previous year (2025)
- Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1154 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per capita 1,276 current US$ per person (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) 3.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 0.1167 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 1,290 current US$ per person (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) 8.15 % change on previous year (2025)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per 7.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic was 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 170,093 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Dominican Republic ranks 56th out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 101.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.