Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina
Argentina: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina is 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.5% on the previous year and down 0.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina peaked at 46,233 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 16,918 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1966.
That places Argentina 150th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 17,441 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 16,918 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1967 | 17,561 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1968 | 19,750 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1969 | 21,913 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1970 | 18,502 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1971 | 20,450 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1972 | 20,809 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1973 | 20,766 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1974 | 22,259 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1975 | 22,126 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1976 | 20,430 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1977 | 22,233 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1978 | 19,762 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1979 | 24,196 constant LCU per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1980 | 21,507 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1981 | 20,351 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1982 | 20,236 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 20,572 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 20,944 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1985 | 20,027 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1986 | 20,981 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1987 | 20,883 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1988 | 20,354 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1989 | 18,867 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1990 | 17,977 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1991 | 18,763 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1992 | 21,173 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1993 | 26,193 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1994 | 27,867 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1995 | 26,468 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1996 | 29,080 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1997 | 32,828 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1998 | 34,193 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1999 | 31,354 constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2000 | 30,871 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 27,926 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2002 | 19,488 constant LCU per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 2003 | 22,715 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2004 | 26,560 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2005 | 28,411 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2006 | 31,447 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2007 | 36,039 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2008 | 38,133 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2009 | 35,513 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2010 | 39,290 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2011 | 42,848 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2012 | 43,264 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 44,730 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 42,091 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2015 | 43,318 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 42,699 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2017 | 44,434 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2018 | 43,426 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2019 | 41,722 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2020 | 37,600 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2021 | 41,494 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2022 | 46,233 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2023 | 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 364,095 constant LCU per square kilometre, 12% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 714,509 constant LCU per square kilometre, 6% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,716 constant LCU per square kilometre | 16,918 constant LCU per square kilometre | 21,913 constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 21,153 constant LCU per square kilometre | 18,502 constant LCU per square kilometre | 24,196 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 20,472 constant LCU per square kilometre | 18,867 constant LCU per square kilometre | 21,507 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 26,590 constant LCU per square kilometre | 17,977 constant LCU per square kilometre | 34,193 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 29,710 constant LCU per square kilometre | 19,488 constant LCU per square kilometre | 38,133 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 42,782 constant LCU per square kilometre | 39,290 constant LCU per square kilometre | 44,730 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 42,489 constant LCU per square kilometre | 37,600 constant LCU per square kilometre | 46,233 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 147 Jordan 48,095 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 148 Montenegro 46,427 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 149 Tunisia 45,620 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 151 Peru 39,543 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 152 Isle of Man 38,132 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 153 Ghana 36,138 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Argentina
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 2.83 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0041 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 61.81 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 3.13 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -73.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0046 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 68.36 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 38.7 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina was 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 46,233 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 16,918 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Argentina rank for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Argentina ranks 150th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.