Argentina vs Jordan: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
48,095 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
150th
Jordan rank
147th

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Jordan
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196519942023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 48,095 constant LCU per square kilometre against 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 3,465 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 150th and Jordan ranks 147th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 21,656 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,638 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,017 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 20,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,609 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,863 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 26,590 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,298 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,291 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 29,710 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,405 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,695 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 42,782 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,374 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,592 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 42,489 constant LCU per square kilometre 48,423 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,934 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Jordan?
Jordan, at 48,095 constant LCU per square kilometre against 44,630 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Jordan?
3,465 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Jordan?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Jordan rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 150th and Jordan ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Jordan: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/jordan/">Argentina vs Jordan: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.