Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Zambia
Zambia: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre was 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 10.0%
World rank
172nd
of 193 countries
All-time high
22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
2,755 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Zambia, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.0% on the previous year and up 53.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Zambia peaked at 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2,755 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Zambia ranks 172nd of 193 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Zambia, year by year
| Year | constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 3,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 2,755 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1967 | 3,111 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1968 | 3,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 3,008 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1970 | 3,331 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1971 | 3,258 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1972 | 3,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1973 | 3,421 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1974 | 3,580 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1975 | 3,456 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1976 | 3,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1977 | 3,514 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1978 | 3,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1979 | 3,428 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1980 | 3,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1981 | 4,059 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1982 | 3,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1983 | 3,409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1984 | 3,426 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1985 | 3,549 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1986 | 3,427 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1987 | 3,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1988 | 4,147 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1989 | 3,778 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1990 | 3,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1991 | 3,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1992 | 3,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1993 | 3,789 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1994 | 3,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1995 | 3,311 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1996 | 3,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1997 | 4,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1998 | 4,248 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1999 | 4,575 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2000 | 4,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2001 | 5,155 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2002 | 5,467 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2003 | 5,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2004 | 6,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2005 | 6,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2006 | 7,466 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2007 | 8,296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2008 | 9,264 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2009 | 10,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2010 | 11,654 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2011 | 12,352 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2012 | 13,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2013 | 14,889 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 15,725 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2015 | 16,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2016 | 16,523 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2017 | 16,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2018 | 18,020 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2019 | 18,655 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2020 | 17,516 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2021 | 18,566 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2022 | 20,802 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2023 | 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2,755 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 3,455 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,258 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,147 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,311 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,575 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6,945 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 15,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 11,654 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 18,655 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 19,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 17,516 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 169 Guinea-Bissau 26,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 170 Gabon 25,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 171 Kyrgyzstan 23,373 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 173 Guinea 21,796 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 174 Botswana 19,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 175 Suriname 17,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Zambia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.31 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 4.92 Percent per annum (2029)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per capita 722.42 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), annual 14.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per 0.3533 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per 465.64 current US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), annual 9.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per 8.88 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per 11,700 current LCU per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 5.21 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Zambia?
- Services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Zambia was 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,755 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Zambia rank for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Zambia ranks 172nd out of 193 countries with data for 2023.
- Is services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Services, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.