Suriname vs Zambia: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Suriname
17,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
175th
Zambia rank
172nd

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zambia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 17,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 5,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 172nd of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 6,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,491 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,314 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 8,580 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,878 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 8,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,047 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 11,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,945 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,823 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 17,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 16,518 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,426 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Suriname or Zambia?
Zambia, at 22,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 17,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Suriname and Zambia?
5,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zambia rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 172nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zambia: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zambia/">Suriname vs Zambia: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.