Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer in China

China: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer was 100 Index in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
100 Index
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 39 countries
All-time high
100 Index
in 2014
All-time low
100 Index
in 2014
Years of data
12
2014–2025

Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer in China, 2014–2025

0204060801002014201920252014: 100 Index2015: 100 Index2016: 100 Index2017: 100 Index2018: 100 Index2019: 100 Index2020: 100 Index2021: 100 Index2022: 100 Index2023: 100 Index2024: 100 Index2025: 100 Index

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Index.

Analysis

In 2025, services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer in China stood at 100 Index. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer in China peaked at 100 Index in 2014 and was at its lowest, 100 Index, in 2014.

That places China 1st out of 39 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.

Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer in China, year by year

Annual values for Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer in China, 2014 to 2025.
Year Index Change
2014 100 Index
2015 100 Index +0.0%
2016 100 Index +0.0%
2017 100 Index +0.0%
2018 100 Index +0.0%
2019 100 Index +0.0%
2020 100 Index +0.0%
2021 100 Index +0.0%
2022 100 Index +0.0%
2023 100 Index +0.0%
2024 100 Index +0.0%
2025 100 Index +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 100 Index 100 Index 100 Index 6
2020s 100 Index 100 Index 100 Index 6

Countries ranked near China

  1. 1 Portugal 100 Index compare
  2. 1 Spain 100 Index compare
  3. 1 Sweden 100 Index compare
  4. 1 Switzerland 100 Index compare
  5. 1 Brazil 100 Index compare
  6. 1 India 100 Index compare
  7. 1 Indonesia 100 Index compare
  8. 1 Kazakhstan 100 Index compare
  9. 1 Malaysia 100 Index compare
  10. 1 Peru 100 Index compare
  11. 1 Russian Federation 100 Index compare
  12. 1 Singapore 100 Index compare
  13. 1 South Africa 100 Index compare
  14. 1 Thailand 100 Index compare
  15. 1 Australia 100 Index compare
  16. 1 Austria 100 Index compare
  17. 1 Belgium 100 Index compare
  18. 1 Canada 100 Index compare
  19. 1 Chile 100 Index compare
  20. 1 Colombia 100 Index compare
  21. 1 Costa Rica 100 Index compare
  22. 1 Czechia 100 Index compare
  23. 1 Denmark 100 Index compare
  24. 1 Finland 100 Index compare
  25. 1 France 100 Index compare
  26. 1 Germany 100 Index compare
  27. 1 Greece 100 Index compare
  28. 1 Hungary 100 Index compare
  29. 1 Iceland 100 Index compare
  30. 1 Ireland 100 Index compare
  31. 1 Israel 100 Index compare
  32. 1 Italy 100 Index compare
  33. 1 Japan 100 Index compare
  34. 1 Luxembourg 100 Index compare
  35. 1 Mexico 100 Index compare
  36. 1 New Zealand 100 Index compare
  37. 1 Norway 100 Index compare

See the full ranking of 52 places →

More economy & growth data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer in China?
Services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer in China was 100 Index in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 100 Index in 2014.
What is the lowest services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 100 Index in 2014.
How does China rank for services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer?
China ranks 1st out of 39 countries with data for 2025.
Is services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer in China. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/services-trade-restrictiveness-index-regulatory-database-answer/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/services-trade-restrictiveness-index-regulatory-database-answer/china/">Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
52 places, 622 data points, 2014–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index database contains information on trade restrictions and behind the border regulation in 22 sectors (transport, financial, professional, logistics, audiovisual, construction, telecommunications, distribution, computer). The STRI indicators and database have been updated to 2025 for all sectors. The entries in the database are documented with reference to the sources. A zip file containing the STRI Regulatory Database for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI Regulatory Database 2025 Note: OECD is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites.