China vs Latvia: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer

China
100 Index
in 2025
Latvia
100 Index
in 2025
China rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st

Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer over time

  • China
  • Latvia
020406080100201420192025

How they compare

China currently reports 100 Index against 100 Index in Latvia, a difference of 0 Index.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 39 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 100 Index 100 Index 0 Index
2020s 100 Index 100 Index 0 Index

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer, China or Latvia?
China, at 100 Index against 100 Index in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer between China and Latvia?
0 Index, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index regulatory database — answer?
China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-trade-restrictiveness-index-regulatory-database-answer/china/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-trade-restrictiveness-index-regulatory-database-answer/china/latvia-2/">China vs Latvia: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Regulatory Database — Answer
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
52 places, 622 data points, 2014–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index database contains information on trade restrictions and behind the border regulation in 22 sectors (transport, financial, professional, logistics, audiovisual, construction, telecommunications, distribution, computer). The STRI indicators and database have been updated to 2025 for all sectors. The entries in the database are documented with reference to the sources. A zip file containing the STRI Regulatory Database for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI Regulatory Database 2025 Note: OECD is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites.