Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square was 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square in Russian Federation, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Russian Federation stood at 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4.3% on the previous year and up 15.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Russian Federation peaked at 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1998.
Russian Federation ranks 106th of 195 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 2.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 1994 | 2.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1995 | 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1996 | 2.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1997 | 2.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1998 | 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1999 | 2.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2000 | 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2001 | 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2002 | 2.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2003 | 3.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2004 | 3.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2005 | 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2006 | 3.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2007 | 4.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2008 | 4.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2009 | 4.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2010 | 4.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2011 | 4.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2012 | 4.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2013 | 4.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 4.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 4.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2016 | 4.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 4.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 4.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2019 | 5.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2020 | 4.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2021 | 5.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2022 | 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2023 | 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 3.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 103 Kazakhstan 5.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 104 Andorra 5.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 105 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 5.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 107 Guatemala 5.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 108 Bhutan 4.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 109 Malaysia 4.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Russian Federation
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.25 Percent per annum (2029)
- Services, value added (constant LCU), per capita 425,143 constant LCU per person (2025)
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country), annual growth rate 4.85 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), annual growth 16.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.9161 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per capita 16,350 current US$ per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), annual growth 5.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per unit of GDP 76.63 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per capita 1.37 million current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Russian Federation?
- Gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Russian Federation was 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Russian Federation rank for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
- Russian Federation ranks 106th out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.