Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Kazakhstan
5.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation
5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
103rd
Russian Federation rank
106th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Russian Federation
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M6.0M199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 5.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Russian Federation, a difference of 270,900 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Russian Federation ranks 106th of 195 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 1.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre Russian Federation
2000s 2.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre 936,588 constant LCU per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s 4.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 270,989 constant LCU per square kilometre Russian Federation
2020s 5.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 174,512 constant LCU per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Kazakhstan or Russian Federation?
Kazakhstan, at 5.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
270,900 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Russian Federation rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Russian Federation ranks 106th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/">Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.