Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Pakistan
Pakistan: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre was 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 125.5%
World rank
65th
of 184 countries
All-time high
7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
1,610 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Pakistan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Pakistan stood at 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 125.5% on the previous year and up 156.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Pakistan peaked at 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 1,610 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Pakistan ranks 65th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,610 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2,087 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1963 | 3,081 current LCU per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1964 | 4,286 current LCU per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 1965 | 4,686 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1966 | 5,470 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1967 | 5,681 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1968 | 5,959 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1969 | 6,138 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1970 | 8,089 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 1971 | 8,420 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1972 | 8,898 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1973 | 11,688 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1974 | 10,860 current LCU per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1975 | 10,632 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1976 | 16,600 current LCU per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 1977 | 19,032 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1978 | 18,147 current LCU per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1979 | 16,027 current LCU per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1980 | 21,123 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 1981 | 33,449 current LCU per square kilometre | +58.4% |
| 1982 | 34,998 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1983 | 40,005 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1984 | 41,918 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1985 | 38,508 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1986 | 73,083 current LCU per square kilometre | +89.8% |
| 1987 | 102,899 current LCU per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 1988 | 109,057 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1989 | 126,151 current LCU per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1990 | 149,655 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1991 | 230,356 current LCU per square kilometre | +53.9% |
| 1992 | 267,051 current LCU per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1993 | 254,216 current LCU per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1994 | 340,337 current LCU per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 1995 | 383,232 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1996 | 398,048 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1997 | 416,778 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1998 | 579,001 current LCU per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 1999 | 531,810 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2000 | 942,109 current LCU per square kilometre | +77.2% |
| 2001 | 1.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2002 | 1.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2003 | 1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2004 | 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2005 | 1.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2006 | 1.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2007 | 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2008 | 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2009 | 1.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 2010 | 1.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2011 | 2.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2012 | 2.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2013 | 2.74 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 2014 | 2.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2015 | 3.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2016 | 3.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2017 | 3.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2018 | 3.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 3.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2020 | 4.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 2021 | 4.06 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2022 | 3.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2023 | 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +125.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,333 current LCU per square kilometre | 1,610 current LCU per square kilometre | 6,138 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 12,839 current LCU per square kilometre | 8,089 current LCU per square kilometre | 19,032 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 62,119 current LCU per square kilometre | 21,123 current LCU per square kilometre | 126,151 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 355,048 current LCU per square kilometre | 149,655 current LCU per square kilometre | 579,001 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | 942,109 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 62 Switzerland 8.33 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 63 Seychelles 7.63 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 64 Philippines 7.55 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 66 Burkina Faso 6.69 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 67 Faroe Islands 6.43 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 68 China 5.96 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Pakistan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.11 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 2.53 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.2831 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 451.87 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth -16.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth -14.97 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 4.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 64.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 102,656 current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Pakistan?
- Gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Pakistan was 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,610 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Pakistan rank for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Pakistan ranks 65th out of 184 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 156.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross domestic savings Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.