China vs Pakistan: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

China
5.96 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
68th
Pakistan rank
65th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Pakistan
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.96 million current LCU per square kilometre in China, a difference of 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 68th and Pakistan ranks 65th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 4,564 current LCU per square kilometre 4,333 current LCU per square kilometre 231.19 current LCU per square kilometre China
1970s 11,721 current LCU per square kilometre 12,839 current LCU per square kilometre 1,119 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 34,902 current LCU per square kilometre 62,119 current LCU per square kilometre 27,217 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 229,427 current LCU per square kilometre 355,048 current LCU per square kilometre 125,622 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 978,072 current LCU per square kilometre 1.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 282,086 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 3.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 497,773 current LCU per square kilometre China
2020s 5.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.03 million current LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, China or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 7.04 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.96 million current LCU per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between China and Pakistan?
1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Pakistan rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
China ranks 68th and Pakistan ranks 65th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Pakistan: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/pakistan/">China vs Pakistan: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.