Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Low income
Low income: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre was 9,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Low income, 2011–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Low income is 9,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 0.9% on the previous year and up 68.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Low income peaked at 9,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 5,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
That places Low income 40th out of 40 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Low income, year by year
| Year | constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 5,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2012 | 5,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2013 | 5,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2014 | 6,119 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2015 | 6,237 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 6,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2017 | 6,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2018 | 7,388 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2019 | 7,666 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2020 | 7,487 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2021 | 8,262 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2022 | 9,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2023 | 9,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6,249 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 7,666 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 8,562 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 7,487 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 37 United States of America 540,957 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Portugal 498,587 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Slovakia 420,008 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Viet Nam 407,834 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Hungary 404,932 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Poland 391,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Panama 375,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Low income
- Industry (including construction), value added 155.56 billion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.3507 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 142.76 billion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 5.1% (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita 293.66 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added 59.60 billion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), annual growth 5.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added 182.48 billion current US$ (2025)
- Services, value added 40.5% (2025)
- Services, value added 225.38 billion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Low income?
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Low income was 9,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 9,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 5,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Low income rank for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Low income ranks 40th out of 40 groups with data for 2023.
- Is gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 68.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross capital formation Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.