GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.1%
World rank
143rd
of 166 countries
All-time high
448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
44,645 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador stood at 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.1% on the previous year and up 15.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 44,645 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 143rd of 166 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 44,645 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 46,969 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1963 | 48,296 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1964 | 51,999 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1965 | 53,341 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1966 | 53,712 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1967 | 56,614 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1968 | 58,041 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1969 | 60,814 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1970 | 64,807 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1971 | 67,996 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1972 | 67,777 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1973 | 69,946 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1974 | 84,761 constant LCU per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1975 | 94,725 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1976 | 102,006 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1977 | 107,635 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1978 | 109,430 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1979 | 117,677 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1980 | 123,113 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1981 | 128,085 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1982 | 124,380 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1983 | 121,754 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1984 | 123,276 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1985 | 132,524 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1986 | 123,040 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1987 | 120,592 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1988 | 113,342 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1989 | 114,809 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1990 | 131,685 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1991 | 139,957 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1992 | 147,678 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1993 | 136,330 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1994 | 142,458 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1995 | 145,201 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1996 | 150,768 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1997 | 157,841 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1998 | 174,027 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1999 | 162,604 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2000 | 179,441 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2001 | 187,033 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2002 | 202,707 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2003 | 211,265 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2004 | 222,968 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2005 | 242,138 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2006 | 261,172 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2007 | 273,396 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2008 | 303,896 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2009 | 293,199 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2010 | 310,930 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2011 | 344,907 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2012 | 363,360 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2013 | 389,464 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2014 | 406,309 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2015 | 390,768 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2016 | 390,128 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2017 | 417,060 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2018 | 421,102 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 421,135 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 374,817 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2021 | 421,312 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2022 | 443,405 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2023 | 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 8% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 30% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 52,714 constant LCU per square kilometre | 44,645 constant LCU per square kilometre | 60,814 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 88,676 constant LCU per square kilometre | 64,807 constant LCU per square kilometre | 117,677 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 122,492 constant LCU per square kilometre | 113,342 constant LCU per square kilometre | 132,524 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 148,855 constant LCU per square kilometre | 131,685 constant LCU per square kilometre | 174,027 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 237,722 constant LCU per square kilometre | 179,441 constant LCU per square kilometre | 303,896 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 385,516 constant LCU per square kilometre | 310,930 constant LCU per square kilometre | 421,135 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 421,944 constant LCU per square kilometre | 374,817 constant LCU per square kilometre | 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 140 Brazil 517,389 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 141 Palau 502,383 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 142 Latvia 490,034 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 144 Peru 440,448 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 145 Solomon Islands 406,484 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 146 Yemen 393,248 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Ecuador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 0 BoP, current US$ (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 0 BoP, current US$ per person (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.30 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 191.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.01 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 71.04 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 41.84 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador was 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 448,240 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 44,645 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 143rd out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.