GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina
Argentina: GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 1.7%
World rank
153rd
of 166 countries
All-time high
280,195 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
67,377 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1963
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina stood at 275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 1.7% on the previous year and up 1.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina peaked at 280,195 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 67,377 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1963.
That places Argentina 153rd out of 166 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 75,005 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 69,466 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1963 | 67,377 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1964 | 75,767 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1965 | 84,835 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1966 | 83,722 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1967 | 84,112 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1968 | 86,330 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1969 | 94,643 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1970 | 93,979 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1971 | 104,092 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1972 | 103,699 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1973 | 109,259 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1974 | 114,224 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1975 | 115,264 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1976 | 111,763 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1977 | 117,208 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1978 | 111,211 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1979 | 123,584 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1980 | 128,919 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1981 | 120,025 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1982 | 112,077 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1983 | 117,533 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1984 | 120,149 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1985 | 113,585 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1986 | 120,357 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1987 | 123,080 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1988 | 122,612 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1989 | 109,954 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1990 | 107,662 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1991 | 121,200 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1992 | 136,705 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1993 | 149,720 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1994 | 158,971 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1995 | 150,591 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1996 | 160,652 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1997 | 175,263 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1998 | 180,487 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 171,565 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2000 | 170,990 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 160,341 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2002 | 143,477 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2003 | 156,737 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2004 | 157,566 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2005 | 169,458 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2006 | 201,345 constant LCU per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 2007 | 222,733 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2008 | 236,781 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2009 | 219,801 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2010 | 244,585 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2011 | 267,700 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2012 | 266,220 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2013 | 271,889 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 262,927 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2015 | 270,538 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 265,501 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2017 | 276,104 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2018 | 265,036 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2019 | 253,679 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2020 | 230,960 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2021 | 262,144 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2022 | 280,195 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2023 | 275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 18% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 80,140 constant LCU per square kilometre | 67,377 constant LCU per square kilometre | 94,643 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 110,428 constant LCU per square kilometre | 93,979 constant LCU per square kilometre | 123,584 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 118,829 constant LCU per square kilometre | 109,954 constant LCU per square kilometre | 128,919 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 151,282 constant LCU per square kilometre | 107,662 constant LCU per square kilometre | 180,487 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 183,923 constant LCU per square kilometre | 143,477 constant LCU per square kilometre | 236,781 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 264,418 constant LCU per square kilometre | 244,585 constant LCU per square kilometre | 276,104 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 262,156 constant LCU per square kilometre | 230,960 constant LCU per square kilometre | 280,195 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 150 Mauritania 313,039 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 151 Bolivia 301,839 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 152 Canada 289,910 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 154 Azerbaijan 260,512 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 155 Eritrea 259,209 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 156 Belize 214,770 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Argentina
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 2.83 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0041 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 61.81 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 3.13 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -73.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0046 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 68.36 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 38.7 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina?
- Gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina was 275,327 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 280,195 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 67,377 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Argentina rank for gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Argentina ranks 153rd out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gni (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.