Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value in Uganda
Uganda: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value was 3.59 % in 2016. ▼ Falling
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value in Uganda, 2001–2016
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2016, gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value in Uganda stood at 3.59 %.
That represents a change of down 19.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value in Uganda peaked at 5.07 % in 2001 and was at its lowest, 2.64 %, in 2002.
Uganda ranks 14th of 73 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value in Uganda, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 5.07 % | — |
| 2002 | 2.64 % | -47.9% |
| 2006 | 4.43 % | +67.8% |
| 2011 | 3.42 % | -22.8% |
| 2016 | 3.59 % | +5.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.05 % | 2.64 % | 5.07 % | 3 |
| 2010s | 3.5 % | 3.42 % | 3.59 % | 2 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
More economy & growth data for Uganda
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.29 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.99 Percent per annum (2029)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 11.68 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.1841 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 222.13 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth 7.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth 10.39 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 18.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 960.69 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 1.16 million current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value in Uganda?
- Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value in Uganda was 3.59 % in 2016, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 5.07 % in 2001.
- What is the lowest gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.64 % in 2002.
- How does Uganda rank for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value?
- Uganda ranks 14th out of 73 countries with data for 2016.
- Is gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.