GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 29.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago is 29.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 1.5% on the previous year and down 16.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 36.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Trinidad and Tobago 66th out of 211 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 5.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1963 | 6.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1964 | 6.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1965 | 6.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1966 | 6.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1967 | 6.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 7.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1969 | 7.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1970 | 7.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1971 | 7.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 8.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1973 | 8.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1974 | 8.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1975 | 8.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1976 | 9.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1977 | 10.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1978 | 11.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1979 | 11.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1980 | 13.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1981 | 13.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1982 | 14.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 12.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1984 | 11.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1985 | 11.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 11.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1987 | 10.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1988 | 10.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1989 | 10.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1990 | 10.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 10.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1992 | 11.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1993 | 11.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1994 | 11.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1995 | 12.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1996 | 13.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1997 | 14.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1998 | 15.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1999 | 16.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2000 | 17.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2001 | 18.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2002 | 20.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2003 | 23.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2004 | 24.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2005 | 26.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2006 | 29.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2007 | 31.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2008 | 32.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2009 | 30.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2010 | 31.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 31.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 34.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2013 | 35.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 36.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2015 | 36.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2016 | 33.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2017 | 31.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2018 | 31.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2019 | 31.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 28.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2021 | 28.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 29.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 29.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 7.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 9.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 7.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 11.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 11.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 14.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 16.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 25.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 17.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 32.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 31.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 36.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 29.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 28.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 29.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 63 Barbados 33.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 64 Aruba 33.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 65 Liechtenstein 30.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 67 Netherlands 26.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 68 Djibouti 26.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 69 Luxembourg 26.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.79 Percent per annum (2029)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1438 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per capita 2,694 current US$ per person (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 0.9706 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per capita 18,183 current LCU per person (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.128 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita 2,397 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per capita 19,116 constant LCU per person (2024)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), annual 2.79 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago was 29.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 36.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 66th out of 211 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GDP (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.