GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Haiti
Haiti: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 21.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
21.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 1.9%
World rank
73rd
of 211 countries
All-time high
23.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2018
All-time low
9.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Haiti, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Haiti stood at 21.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 1.9% on the previous year and down 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Haiti peaked at 23.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 9.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Haiti ranks 73rd of 211 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Haiti, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 9.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 10.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1963 | 10.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1964 | 10.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1965 | 10.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1967 | 10.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1968 | 10.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1969 | 10.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1970 | 10.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 11.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1972 | 11.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1973 | 12.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1974 | 13.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1975 | 13.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1976 | 14.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1977 | 14.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1978 | 15.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1979 | 17.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1980 | 18.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1981 | 17.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1982 | 17.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1983 | 17.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1984 | 17.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 17.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1986 | 17.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1987 | 17.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1988 | 17.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 16.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1990 | 16.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 17.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1992 | 16.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1993 | 15.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1994 | 13.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1995 | 14.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1996 | 15.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1997 | 15.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1998 | 16.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1999 | 16.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 16.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2001 | 16.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2002 | 17.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 17.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2004 | 17.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 17.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2006 | 18.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 19.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2008 | 19.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2009 | 20.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2010 | 19.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2011 | 20.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2012 | 20.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2013 | 21.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 22.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2015 | 22.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2016 | 22.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 23.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2018 | 23.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2019 | 23.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 22.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2021 | 22.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2022 | 21.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2023 | 21.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 13.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 17.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 17.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 16.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 18.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 15.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 13.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 17.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 18.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 16.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 20.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 22.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 19.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 23.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 22.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 21.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 22.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 70 United Arab Emirates 24.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 71 San Marino 23.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 72 Gabon 23.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 74 Thailand 21.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 75 Cayman Islands 21.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 76 Switzerland 19.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Haiti
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 0.3989 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 36.07 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.5419 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per capita 1,460 current US$ per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), annual growth rate 34.53 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 70.82 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per capita 190,809 current LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate -2.7 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.2401 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Haiti?
- Gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Haiti was 21.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 23.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Haiti rank for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Haiti ranks 73rd out of 211 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GDP (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.