Fruit consumption per capita in Malta

Malta: Fruit consumption per capita was 83.49 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
83.49 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 2.0%
Rank
94th
of 191 regions
All-time high
115.21 kilograms per year per capita
in 1995
All-time low
43.16 kilograms per year per capita
in 1965
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Fruit consumption per capita in Malta, 1961–2023

0255075100125196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Malta recorded 83.49 kilograms per year per capita for fruit consumption per capita in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.0% on the previous year and up 8.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fruit consumption per capita in Malta peaked at 115.21 kilograms per year per capita in 1995 and was at its lowest, 43.16 kilograms per year per capita, in 1965.

Malta ranks 94th of 191 regions on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 50.22 kilograms per year per capita 43.16 kilograms per year per capita 56.63 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 57.51 kilograms per year per capita 52.1 kilograms per year per capita 68.23 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 70.09 kilograms per year per capita 60.31 kilograms per year per capita 83.26 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 94.7 kilograms per year per capita 84.51 kilograms per year per capita 115.21 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 100.68 kilograms per year per capita 93.49 kilograms per year per capita 115.05 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 82.53 kilograms per year per capita 73.46 kilograms per year per capita 89.27 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 79.06 kilograms per year per capita 69.13 kilograms per year per capita 83.49 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Malta

  1. 91 Indonesia 85.38 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 92 Bolivia 85.15 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 93 Seychelles 84.5 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 95 Mali 83.04 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 96 El Salvador 82.78 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 97 Angola 82.42 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More economy & growth data for Malta

All data for Malta →

Frequently asked questions

What is fruit consumption per capita in Malta?
Fruit consumption per capita in Malta was 83.49 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fruit consumption per capita recorded in Malta?
The highest recorded value was 115.21 kilograms per year per capita in 1995.
What is the lowest fruit consumption per capita recorded in Malta?
The lowest recorded value was 43.16 kilograms per year per capita in 1965.
How does Malta rank for fruit consumption per capita?
Malta ranks 94th out of 191 regions with data for 2023.
Is fruit consumption per capita rising or falling in Malta?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Malta data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.