Malta vs Seychelles: Fruit consumption per capita
Malta
83.49 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Seychelles
84.5 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Malta rank
94th
Seychelles rank
93rd
Fruit consumption per capita over time
- Malta
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 84.5 kilograms per year per capita against 83.49 kilograms per year per capita in Malta, a difference of 1.01 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 94th and Seychelles ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 82.53 kilograms per year per capita | 73.7 kilograms per year per capita | 8.83 kilograms per year per capita | Malta |
| 2020s | 79.06 kilograms per year per capita | 83.2 kilograms per year per capita | 4.14 kilograms per year per capita | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Malta or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 84.5 kilograms per year per capita against 83.49 kilograms per year per capita in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Malta and Seychelles?
- 1.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Seychelles?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Seychelles rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
- Malta ranks 94th and Seychelles ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.