Fruit consumption by type in Malaysia

Malaysia: Fruit consumption by type was 0.41 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.41 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
down 28.1%
World rank
37th
of 184 countries
All-time high
0.9381 kilograms per year per capita
in 1996
All-time low
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 1964
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Fruit consumption by type in Malaysia, 1961–2023

00.20.40.60.81196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Malaysia recorded 0.41 kilograms per year per capita for fruit consumption by type in 2023.

That represents a change of down 28.1% on the previous year and down 30.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fruit consumption by type in Malaysia peaked at 0.9381 kilograms per year per capita in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 kilograms per year per capita, in 1964.

Malaysia ranks 37th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0094 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.0535 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 0.3431 kilograms per year per capita 0.2574 kilograms per year per capita 0.5144 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 0.336 kilograms per year per capita 0.2286 kilograms per year per capita 0.5336 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 0.5099 kilograms per year per capita 0.1225 kilograms per year per capita 0.9381 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 0.4823 kilograms per year per capita 0.4271 kilograms per year per capita 0.5363 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 0.531 kilograms per year per capita 0.42 kilograms per year per capita 0.7 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 0.5375 kilograms per year per capita 0.41 kilograms per year per capita 0.63 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Malaysia

  1. 34 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.49 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 35 Denmark 0.45 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 36 Montenegro 0.45 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 38 Sri Lanka 0.4 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 39 Canada 0.4 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 40 Sweden 0.39 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More economy & growth data for Malaysia

All data for Malaysia →

Frequently asked questions

What is fruit consumption by type in Malaysia?
Fruit consumption by type in Malaysia was 0.41 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fruit consumption by type recorded in Malaysia?
The highest recorded value was 0.9381 kilograms per year per capita in 1996.
What is the lowest fruit consumption by type recorded in Malaysia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kilograms per year per capita in 1964.
How does Malaysia rank for fruit consumption by type?
Malaysia ranks 37th out of 184 countries with data for 2023.
Is fruit consumption by type rising or falling in Malaysia?
Over the last ten years it is down 30.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Malaysia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fruit consumption by type. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
185 places, 9,134 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.