Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of in United States of America
United States of America: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of was 0.0015 Percentage change in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of in United States of America, 1996–2018
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.
Analysis
In 2018, environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in United States of America stood at 0.0015 Percentage change.
The figure is up 3,256.9% on the previous year and up 114.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in United States of America peaked at 0.004 Percentage change in 2010 and was at its lowest, -0.0106 Percentage change, in 2008.
United States of America ranks 13th of 42 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of in United States of America, year by year
| Year | Percentage change | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.0025 Percentage change | — |
| 1997 | 0.0007 Percentage change | -130.4% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 Percentage change | -62.3% |
| 1999 | -0.0001 Percentage change | -127.3% |
| 2000 | -0.0005 Percentage change | +528.7% |
| 2001 | -0.0023 Percentage change | +383.0% |
| 2002 | -0.0003 Percentage change | -88.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0008 Percentage change | -420.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0027 Percentage change | +226.5% |
| 2005 | -0.0032 Percentage change | -216.7% |
| 2006 | -0.0009 Percentage change | -70.9% |
| 2007 | -0.0042 Percentage change | +357.1% |
| 2008 | -0.0106 Percentage change | +151.4% |
| 2009 | -0.0047 Percentage change | -55.2% |
| 2010 | 0.004 Percentage change | -185.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0031 Percentage change | -24.3% |
| 2012 | -0.001 Percentage change | -133.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0009 Percentage change | -189.6% |
| 2014 | -0.0004 Percentage change | -138.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0002 Percentage change | -150.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0014 Percentage change | +704.3% |
| 2017 | -0 Percentage change | -103.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0015 Percentage change | -3256.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0004 Percentage change | -0.0025 Percentage change | 0.0007 Percentage change | 4 |
| 2000s | -0.0023 Percentage change | -0.0106 Percentage change | 0.0027 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0011 Percentage change | -0.001 Percentage change | 0.004 Percentage change | 9 |
Countries ranked near United States of America
More economy & growth data for United States of America
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.63 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.12 Percent per annum (2029)
- Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita 54,931 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), annual growth rate 5.59 % change on previous year (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), per capita 88,812 current US$ per person (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate 5.59 % change on previous year (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP 1.03 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per capita 88,812 current LCU per person (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 3.1 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in United States of America?
- Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in United States of America was 0.0015 Percentage change in 2018, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of recorded in United States of America?
- The highest recorded value was 0.004 Percentage change in 2010.
- What is the lowest environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of recorded in United States of America?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0106 Percentage change in 2008.
- How does United States of America rank for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- United States of America ranks 13th out of 42 countries with data for 2018.
- Is environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of rising or falling in United States of America?
- Over the last ten years it is up 114.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United States of America data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services