Spain vs United States of America: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of

Spain
0.0007 Percentage change
in 2018
United States of America
0.0015 Percentage change
in 2018
Spain rank
15th
United States of America rank
13th

Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time

  • Spain
  • United States of America
-0.0100.01199620072018

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0.0015 Percentage change against 0.0007 Percentage change in Spain, a difference of 0.0008 Percentage change.

That makes United States of America's figure about 2.3 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was United States of America ahead.

Spain ranks 15th and United States of America ranks 13th of 42 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and United States of America in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0006 Percentage change -0.0004 Percentage change 0.0002 Percentage change United States of America
2000s -0.0012 Percentage change -0.0023 Percentage change 0.0011 Percentage change Spain
2010s 0.0004 Percentage change 0.0011 Percentage change 0.0007 Percentage change United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Spain or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0.0015 Percentage change against 0.0007 Percentage change in Spain as of 2018.
What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Spain and United States of America?
0.0008 Percentage change, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and United States of America?
23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
How do Spain and United States of America rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
Spain ranks 15th and United States of America ranks 13th of 42 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs United States of America: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-adjusted-multifactor-productivity-contribution-of-non-cultivated/spain/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-adjusted-multifactor-productivity-contribution-of-non-cultivated/spain/united-states/">Spain vs United States of America: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
52 places, 1,196 data points, 1996–2018
Last refreshed

Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services