Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of in Latvia
Latvia: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of was 0.0015 Percentage change in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of in Latvia, 1996–2018
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.
Analysis
The most recent figure for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in Latvia is 0.0015 Percentage change, measured in 2018.
That represents a change of up 116.0% on the previous year and up 100.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in Latvia peaked at 0.5439 Percentage change in 1999 and was at its lowest, -0.1762 Percentage change, in 2001.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Percentage change | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.3135 Percentage change | — |
| 1997 | 0.1064 Percentage change | -66.0% |
| 1998 | 0.1983 Percentage change | +86.3% |
| 1999 | 0.5439 Percentage change | +174.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0431 Percentage change | -92.1% |
| 2001 | -0.1762 Percentage change | -508.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0727 Percentage change | -141.3% |
| 2003 | -0.0611 Percentage change | -184.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0225 Percentage change | -136.9% |
| 2005 | -0.0218 Percentage change | -196.8% |
| 2006 | -0.0364 Percentage change | +66.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0059 Percentage change | -116.1% |
| 2008 | -0.1649 Percentage change | -2905.5% |
| 2009 | -0.0054 Percentage change | -96.7% |
| 2010 | 0.1451 Percentage change | -2771.3% |
| 2011 | -0.1266 Percentage change | -187.3% |
| 2012 | -0.133 Percentage change | +5.0% |
| 2013 | -0.0303 Percentage change | -77.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0373 Percentage change | -223.4% |
| 2015 | -0.0489 Percentage change | -231.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0457 Percentage change | -193.4% |
| 2017 | -0.0094 Percentage change | -120.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0015 Percentage change | -116.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2905 Percentage change | 0.1064 Percentage change | 0.5439 Percentage change | 4 |
| 2000s | -0.0322 Percentage change | -0.1762 Percentage change | 0.0727 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.0132 Percentage change | -0.133 Percentage change | 0.1451 Percentage change | 9 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 1 Estonia 0.0889 Percentage change compare
- 1 Croatia 0.0117 Percentage change compare
- 1 South Africa 0.0269 Percentage change compare
- 2 Türkiye 0.0073 Percentage change compare
- 2 Russian Federation 0.0243 Percentage change compare
- 3 Finland 0.0203 Percentage change compare
- 3 Lithuania 0.0035 Percentage change compare
- 4 New Zealand 0.0178 Percentage change compare
- 5 Poland 0.0008 Percentage change compare
- 5 Brazil 0.0153 Percentage change compare
- 6 Slovenia 0 Percentage change compare
- 6 Chile 0.0091 Percentage change compare
- 7 Netherlands -0 Percentage change compare
- 7 Romania 0.0035 Percentage change compare
More economy & growth data for Latvia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.53 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.49 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 16 - Public finances 38.69 Percentage of GDP (2029)
- Index of digital trade integration and openness 0.1982 Index (2024)
- Index of digital trade integration and openness (INDIGO) — A. 0.0249 Index (2024)
- Index of digital trade integration and openness (INDIGO) — B. Openess 0.0123 Index (2024)
- Index of digital trade integration and openness (INDIGO) — E. Wider 0.0451 Index (2024)
- Index of digital trade integration and openness (INDIGO) — D. 0.0431 Index (2024)
- Index of digital trade integration and openness (INDIGO) — C. Trust 0.0727 Index (2024)
- Corporate income tax (CIT) - statutory and targeted small business 20 Percentage of taxable income (2026)
Frequently asked questions
- What is environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in Latvia?
- Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of in Latvia was 0.0015 Percentage change in 2018, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5439 Percentage change in 1999.
- What is the lowest environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.1762 Percentage change in 2001.
- How does Latvia rank for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Latvia ranks 4th out of 7 countries with data for 2018.
- Is environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services