Latvia vs New Zealand: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0178 Percentage change against 0.0015 Percentage change in Latvia, a difference of 0.0163 Percentage change.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 11.8 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 7 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2905 Percentage change | 0.008 Percentage change | 0.2825 Percentage change | Latvia |
| 2000s | -0.0322 Percentage change | 0.0074 Percentage change | 0.0396 Percentage change | New Zealand |
| 2010s | -0.0132 Percentage change | 0.0292 Percentage change | 0.0423 Percentage change | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Latvia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.0178 Percentage change against 0.0015 Percentage change in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.0163 Percentage change, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Latvia ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 7 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services