Discrepancy in GDP, value added in Namibia

Namibia: Discrepancy in GDP, value added was 2.00 million constant LCU in 2011. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2011)
2.00 million constant LCU
Change on year
down 77.8%
World rank
14th
of 41 countries
All-time high
10.61 billion constant LCU
in 1999
All-time low
-46.00 million constant LCU
in 2007
Years of data
28
1980–2011

Discrepancy in GDP, value added in Namibia, 1980–2011

02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B1980199520111980: 6.2B constant LCU1981: 6.3B constant LCU1982: 6.4B constant LCU1983: 6.4B constant LCU1984: 6.5B constant LCU1985: 6.5B constant LCU1986: 6.8B constant LCU1987: 7.1B constant LCU1988: 7.1B constant LCU1993: 8.3B constant LCU1994: 8.8B constant LCU1995: 9.2B constant LCU1996: 9.7B constant LCU1997: 10.0B constant LCU1998: 10.2B constant LCU1999: 10.6B constant LCU2000: -11.0M constant LCU2001: -7.0M constant LCU2002: -9.0M constant LCU2003: -14.0M constant LCU2004: -13.0M constant LCU2005: 0 constant LCU2006: -1.0M constant LCU2007: -46.0M constant LCU2008: 1.0M constant LCU2009: 2.0M constant LCU2010: 9.0M constant LCU2011: 2.0M constant LCU

Source: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Measured in constant LCU.

Analysis

Namibia recorded 2.00 million constant LCU for discrepancy in gdp, value added in 2011.

The figure is down 77.8% on the previous year and up 128.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, discrepancy in gdp, value added in Namibia peaked at 10.61 billion constant LCU in 1999 and was at its lowest, -46.00 million constant LCU, in 2007.

That places Namibia 14th out of 41 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 6.59 billion constant LCU 6.24 billion constant LCU 7.10 billion constant LCU 9
1990s 9.54 billion constant LCU 8.33 billion constant LCU 10.61 billion constant LCU 7
2000s -9.80 million constant LCU -46.00 million constant LCU 2.00 million constant LCU 10
2010s 5.50 million constant LCU 2.00 million constant LCU 9.00 million constant LCU 2

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 11 Seychelles 885.91 million constant LCU compare
  2. 12 Botswana 351.50 million constant LCU compare
  3. 13 Equatorial Guinea 32.81 million constant LCU compare
  4. 15 Mali 1 constant LCU compare
  5. 16 Guinea 0.0015 constant LCU compare
  6. 17 Chad 0.001 constant LCU compare

See the full ranking of 41 places →

More economy & growth data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is discrepancy in gdp, value added in Namibia?
Discrepancy in gdp, value added in Namibia was 2.00 million constant LCU in 2011, according to World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.
What is the highest discrepancy in gdp, value added recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 10.61 billion constant LCU in 1999.
What is the lowest discrepancy in gdp, value added recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was -46.00 million constant LCU in 2007.
How does Namibia rank for discrepancy in gdp, value added?
Namibia ranks 14th out of 41 countries with data for 2011.
Is discrepancy in gdp, value added rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is up 128.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as part of Discrepancy in GDP, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Discrepancy in GDP, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
41 places, 1,226 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

This is the discrepancy included in the value added of services, etc. Covered here are any discrepancies noted by national compilers as well as discrepancies arising from linking new and old series in the World Bank data base. Data are in constant local currency.