Guinea vs Namibia: Discrepancy in GDP, value added
Guinea
0.0015 constant LCU
in 2011
Namibia
2.00 million constant LCU
in 2011
Guinea rank
16th
Namibia rank
14th
Discrepancy in GDP, value added over time
- Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2.00 million constant LCU against 0.0015 constant LCU in Guinea, a difference of 2.00 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Guinea ranks 16th and Namibia ranks 14th of 41 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0001 constant LCU | 9.93 billion constant LCU | 9.93 billion constant LCU | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0002 constant LCU | -9.80 million constant LCU | 9.80 million constant LCU | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0007 constant LCU | 5.50 million constant LCU | 5.50 million constant LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in gdp, value added, Guinea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 2.00 million constant LCU against 0.0015 constant LCU in Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in gdp, value added between Guinea and Namibia?
- 2.00 million constant LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Guinea and Namibia rank globally for discrepancy in gdp, value added?
- Guinea ranks 16th and Namibia ranks 14th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Discrepancy in GDP, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This is the discrepancy included in the value added of services, etc. Covered here are any discrepancies noted by national compilers as well as discrepancies arising from linking new and old series in the World Bank data base. Data are in constant local currency.