Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Denmark
Denmark: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP was 0 current LCU in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0 current LCU
Change on year
up 100.0%
World rank
76th
of 185 countries
All-time high
1.51 million current LCU
in 2020
All-time low
-299,000 current LCU
in 2009
Years of data
60
1966–2025
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Denmark, 1966–2025
Source: Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Measured in current LCU.
Analysis
The most recent figure for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Denmark is 0 current LCU, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Denmark peaked at 1.51 million current LCU in 2020 and was at its lowest, -299,000 current LCU, in 2009.
Denmark ranks 76th of 185 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Denmark, year by year
| Year | current LCU | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1967 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1968 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1969 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1970 | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1971 | -1,000 current LCU | -26214381309.5% |
| 1972 | -2,000 current LCU | +100.0% |
| 1973 | -2,000 current LCU | -0.0% |
| 1974 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1975 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1976 | 1,000 current LCU | -200.0% |
| 1977 | 1,000 current LCU | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 1,000 current LCU | +0.0% |
| 1979 | -1,000 current LCU | -200.0% |
| 1980 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1981 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1982 | -2,000 current LCU | +100.0% |
| 1983 | -2,000 current LCU | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -1,000 current LCU | -50.0% |
| 1985 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1986 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1987 | -1,000 current LCU | -0.0% |
| 1988 | 1,000 current LCU | -200.0% |
| 1989 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1990 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1991 | -3,000 current LCU | +200.0% |
| 1992 | -1,000 current LCU | -66.7% |
| 1993 | -1,000 current LCU | -0.0% |
| 1994 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
| 1995 | -1,000 current LCU | — |
| 1996 | -2,000 current LCU | +100.0% |
| 1997 | -1,000 current LCU | -50.0% |
| 1998 | -2,000 current LCU | +100.0% |
| 1999 | 1,000 current LCU | -150.0% |
| 2000 | -2,000 current LCU | -300.0% |
| 2001 | 591,000 current LCU | -29650.0% |
| 2002 | 230,000 current LCU | -61.1% |
| 2003 | -121,000 current LCU | -152.6% |
| 2004 | 185,000 current LCU | -252.9% |
| 2005 | -298,000 current LCU | -261.1% |
| 2006 | -52,000 current LCU | -82.6% |
| 2007 | 49,000 current LCU | -194.2% |
| 2008 | -183,000 current LCU | -473.5% |
| 2009 | -299,000 current LCU | +63.4% |
| 2010 | -29,000 current LCU | -90.3% |
| 2011 | -63,000 current LCU | +117.2% |
| 2012 | -4,000 current LCU | -93.7% |
| 2013 | -3,000 current LCU | -25.0% |
| 2014 | -38,000 current LCU | +1166.7% |
| 2015 | 178,000 current LCU | -568.4% |
| 2016 | 110,000 current LCU | -38.2% |
| 2017 | 269,000 current LCU | +144.5% |
| 2018 | 27,000 current LCU | -90.0% |
| 2019 | 164,000 current LCU | +507.4% |
| 2020 | 1.51 million current LCU | +822.6% |
| 2021 | 167,000 current LCU | -89.0% |
| 2022 | -158,000 current LCU | -194.6% |
| 2023 | -188,000 current LCU | +19.0% |
| 2024 | -1,000 current LCU | -99.5% |
| 2025 | 0 current LCU | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -500 current LCU | -1,000 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 4 |
| 1970s | -400 current LCU | -2,000 current LCU | 1,000 current LCU | 10 |
| 1980s | -700 current LCU | -2,000 current LCU | 1,000 current LCU | 10 |
| 1990s | -1,100 current LCU | -3,000 current LCU | 1,000 current LCU | 10 |
| 2000s | 10,000 current LCU | -299,000 current LCU | 591,000 current LCU | 10 |
| 2010s | 61,100 current LCU | -63,000 current LCU | 269,000 current LCU | 10 |
| 2020s | 222,167 current LCU | -188,000 current LCU | 1.51 million current LCU | 6 |
Countries ranked near Denmark
- 73 Senegal 0.0293 current LCU compare
- 74 Ethiopia 0.0112 current LCU compare
- 75 Greenland 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Albania 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Angola 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Armenia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Belgium 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Benin 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Brazil 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Bulgaria 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Burkina Faso 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Colombia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Comoros 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Croatia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Czechia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Ecuador 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Egypt 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Eswatini 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Georgia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Germany 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Guinea-Bissau 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Hong Kong, China 0 current LCU
- 76 Hungary 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Iceland 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Israel 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Japan 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Latvia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Macau, China 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Malawi 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Malta 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Mauritania 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Morocco 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Netherlands 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Panama 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Papua New Guinea 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Peru 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Poland 0 current LCU
- 76 Portugal 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Romania 0 current LCU compare
- 76 San Marino 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Slovakia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Slovenia 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Spain 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Sweden 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Switzerland 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Togo 0 current LCU compare
- 76 Ukraine 0 current LCU compare
More economy & growth data for Denmark
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 0.9574 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.4 Percent per annum (2029)
- GDP (current US$), annual growth rate 8.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (current US$), per capita 76,970 current US$ per person (2025)
- GDP (current LCU), annual growth rate 4.64 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP 6.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GDP (current LCU), per capita 509,683 current LCU per person (2025)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 2.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.8083 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita 62,218 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Denmark?
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Denmark was 0 current LCU in 2025, according to Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks.
- What is the highest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 1.51 million current LCU in 2020.
- What is the lowest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was -299,000 current LCU in 2009.
- How does Denmark rank for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 76th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp rising or falling in Denmark?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as part of Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.