Denmark vs Japan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Japan, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 77th and Japan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -400 current LCU | -232.32 billion current LCU | 232.32 billion current LCU | Denmark |
| 1980s | -700 current LCU | 2.08 trillion current LCU | 2.08 trillion current LCU | Japan |
| 1990s | -1,100 current LCU | -583.19 billion current LCU | 583.19 billion current LCU | Denmark |
| 2000s | 10,000 current LCU | 10.00 million current LCU | 9.99 million current LCU | Japan |
| 2010s | 61,100 current LCU | 30.00 million current LCU | 29.94 million current LCU | Japan |
| 2020s | 266,600 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 266,600 current LCU | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Denmark or Japan?
- Denmark, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Denmark and Japan?
- 0 current LCU, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 77th and Japan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.