Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Israel
Israel: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP was 0 constant LCU in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0 constant LCU
Change on year
up 100.0%
World rank
67th
of 154 countries
All-time high
9.14 million constant LCU
in 1995
All-time low
-11.42 million constant LCU
in 2012
Years of data
56
1970–2025
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Israel, 1970–2025
Source: Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Measured in constant LCU.
Analysis
In 2025, discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Israel stood at 0 constant LCU.
The figure is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Israel peaked at 9.14 million constant LCU in 1995 and was at its lowest, -11.42 million constant LCU, in 2012.
Israel ranks 67th of 154 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP in Israel, year by year
| Year | constant LCU | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 2.73 million constant LCU | — |
| 1971 | 3.03 million constant LCU | +10.9% |
| 1972 | 3.40 million constant LCU | +12.1% |
| 1973 | 3.59 million constant LCU | +5.6% |
| 1974 | 3.82 million constant LCU | +6.5% |
| 1975 | 3.95 million constant LCU | +3.2% |
| 1976 | 3.96 million constant LCU | +0.3% |
| 1977 | 4.00 million constant LCU | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 4.22 million constant LCU | +5.5% |
| 1979 | 4.49 million constant LCU | +6.2% |
| 1980 | 4.56 million constant LCU | +1.7% |
| 1981 | 4.80 million constant LCU | +5.3% |
| 1982 | 4.91 million constant LCU | +2.1% |
| 1983 | 5.07 million constant LCU | +3.3% |
| 1984 | 5.12 million constant LCU | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 5.33 million constant LCU | +4.0% |
| 1986 | 5.55 million constant LCU | +4.2% |
| 1987 | 5.94 million constant LCU | +7.1% |
| 1988 | 6.12 million constant LCU | +2.9% |
| 1989 | 6.15 million constant LCU | +0.6% |
| 1990 | 6.60 million constant LCU | +7.3% |
| 1991 | 7.11 million constant LCU | +7.7% |
| 1992 | 7.66 million constant LCU | +7.8% |
| 1993 | 7.98 million constant LCU | +4.1% |
| 1994 | 8.57 million constant LCU | +7.4% |
| 1995 | 9.14 million constant LCU | +6.6% |
| 1996 | -835,000 constant LCU | -109.1% |
| 1997 | -2.25 million constant LCU | +169.6% |
| 1998 | 697,000 constant LCU | -131.0% |
| 1999 | 4.04 million constant LCU | +480.1% |
| 2000 | 4.82 million constant LCU | +19.1% |
| 2001 | 2.37 million constant LCU | -50.8% |
| 2002 | 1.76 million constant LCU | -25.6% |
| 2003 | 2.23 million constant LCU | +26.6% |
| 2004 | -5.08 million constant LCU | -327.3% |
| 2005 | -5.50 million constant LCU | +8.4% |
| 2006 | -6.10 million constant LCU | +10.8% |
| 2007 | -5.42 million constant LCU | -11.1% |
| 2008 | -6.21 million constant LCU | +14.7% |
| 2009 | -6.14 million constant LCU | -1.1% |
| 2010 | -7.69 million constant LCU | +25.2% |
| 2011 | -6.58 million constant LCU | -14.5% |
| 2012 | -11.42 million constant LCU | +73.7% |
| 2013 | -9.92 million constant LCU | -13.2% |
| 2014 | -10.24 million constant LCU | +3.2% |
| 2015 | -10.48 million constant LCU | +2.4% |
| 2016 | -8.52 million constant LCU | -18.8% |
| 2017 | -10.87 million constant LCU | +27.6% |
| 2018 | -8.38 million constant LCU | -22.9% |
| 2019 | -7.32 million constant LCU | -12.6% |
| 2020 | -1.99 million constant LCU | -72.8% |
| 2021 | -2.17 million constant LCU | +9.4% |
| 2022 | -2.12 million constant LCU | -2.4% |
| 2023 | -2.08 million constant LCU | -1.8% |
| 2024 | -2.46 million constant LCU | +18.3% |
| 2025 | 0 constant LCU | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.72 million constant LCU | 2.73 million constant LCU | 4.49 million constant LCU | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.35 million constant LCU | 4.56 million constant LCU | 6.15 million constant LCU | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.87 million constant LCU | -2.25 million constant LCU | 9.14 million constant LCU | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.33 million constant LCU | -6.21 million constant LCU | 4.82 million constant LCU | 10 |
| 2010s | -9.14 million constant LCU | -11.42 million constant LCU | -6.58 million constant LCU | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.81 million constant LCU | -2.46 million constant LCU | 0 constant LCU | 6 |
Countries ranked near Israel
- 64 Paraguay 0.0078 constant LCU compare
- 65 Bhutan 0 constant LCU compare
- 66 South Sudan 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Austria 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Belgium 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Benin 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Cuba 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Czechia 0 constant LCU
- 67 Denmark 0 constant LCU
- 67 Djibouti 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Estonia 0 constant LCU
- 67 Finland 0 constant LCU
- 67 France 0 constant LCU
- 67 Germany 0 constant LCU
- 67 Greece 0 constant LCU
- 67 Honduras 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Hungary 0 constant LCU
- 67 Iceland 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Ireland 0 constant LCU
- 67 Italy 0 constant LCU
- 67 Japan 0 constant LCU
- 67 Latvia 0 constant LCU
- 67 Lithuania 0 constant LCU
- 67 Luxembourg 0 constant LCU
- 67 Malawi 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Netherlands 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Norway 0 constant LCU
- 67 Peru 0 constant LCU
- 67 Portugal 0 constant LCU
- 67 San Marino 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Slovakia 0 constant LCU
- 67 Slovenia 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 Spain 0 constant LCU
- 67 Sweden 0 constant LCU
- 67 Switzerland 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 constant LCU compare
- 67 United States of America 0 constant LCU compare
More economy & growth data for Israel
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.14 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.56 Percent per annum (2029)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1124 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per capita 6,095 current US$ per person (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 0.4159 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per capita 22,550 current LCU per person (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.1029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita 5,579 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per capita 19,946 constant LCU per person (2024)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), annual 0.4688 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Israel?
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp in Israel was 0 constant LCU in 2025, according to Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks.
- What is the highest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp recorded in Israel?
- The highest recorded value was 9.14 million constant LCU in 1995.
- What is the lowest discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp recorded in Israel?
- The lowest recorded value was -11.42 million constant LCU in 2012.
- How does Israel rank for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Israel ranks 67th out of 154 countries with data for 2025.
- Is discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp rising or falling in Israel?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Israel data come from?
- The figures come from Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as part of Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 56 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.