Cuba vs Israel: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Israel
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 constant LCU against 0 constant LCU in Israel, a difference of 0 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and Israel ranks 67th of 154 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 322,567 constant LCU | 829,667 constant LCU | 507,100 constant LCU | Israel |
| 2000s | 63,800 constant LCU | -2.33 million constant LCU | 2.39 million constant LCU | Cuba |
| 2010s | 111,440 constant LCU | -9.14 million constant LCU | 9.25 million constant LCU | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 constant LCU | -2.17 million constant LCU | 2.17 million constant LCU | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Cuba or Israel?
- Cuba, at 0 constant LCU against 0 constant LCU in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Cuba and Israel?
- 0 constant LCU, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Israel?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Israel rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 67th and Israel ranks 67th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.