Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Namibia
Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Namibia, 1980–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Namibia is 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 46 years on record.
The figure is down 12.5% on the previous year and down 20.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Namibia peaked at 4.45 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 1985 and was at its lowest, 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places Namibia 85th out of 197 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Namibia, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 3 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1981 | 3.11 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 1982 | 3.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1983 | 2.84 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1984 | 3.47 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +22.4% |
| 1985 | 4.45 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +28.0% |
| 1986 | 3.99 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1987 | 3.3 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1988 | 3.07 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1989 | 3.21 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +4.5% |
| 1990 | 3.06 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 1991 | 3.08 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 1992 | 2.13 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -31.1% |
| 1993 | 2.18 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 2.42 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +11.0% |
| 1995 | 2.1 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1996 | 2.42 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +14.9% |
| 1997 | 2.14 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1998 | 2.25 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +5.3% |
| 1999 | 2.5 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +11.1% |
| 2000 | 2.59 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2001 | 2.59 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 2002 | 3.32 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +28.6% |
| 2003 | 2.26 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -32.1% |
| 2004 | 1.81 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -19.8% |
| 2005 | 1.9 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 2006 | 1.78 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2007 | 1.54 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2008 | 1.15 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -25.2% |
| 2009 | 1.18 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2010 | 1.02 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.9431 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2012 | 0.9791 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2013 | 0.8552 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2014 | 0.8807 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2015 | 0.8567 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2016 | 0.925 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 2017 | 0.7914 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 2018 | 0.7758 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2019 | 0.8203 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2020 | 1.03 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +26.0% |
| 2021 | 0.8953 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 2022 | 0.8982 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.8731 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2024 | 0.7784 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2025 | 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 2.84 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 4.45 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.43 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 2.1 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 3.08 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.01 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.15 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 3.32 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.885 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.7758 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.02 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8598 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.03 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
- 82 Republic of Moldova 1.02 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 83 Honduras 0.7736 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 84 Eswatini 0.7417 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 86 Greenland 0.6691 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 87 Morocco 0.622 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
- 88 Lesotho 0.5677 constant LCU per US$ of GDP compare
More economy & growth data for Namibia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.07 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.64 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 44.40 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0033 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 14.65 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.93 billion BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -15.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.1418 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 638.56 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate -7.48 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Namibia?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Namibia was 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 4.45 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 1985.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Namibia rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Namibia ranks 85th out of 197 countries with data for 2025.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.