Eswatini vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Eswatini
0.7417 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Namibia
0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eswatini rank
84th
Namibia rank
85th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Namibia
05101520197119982025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.7417 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0.0607 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 85th of 197 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 5.18 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.82 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 2.1 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2.43 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.3288 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Namibia
2000s 1.54 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2.01 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4734 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Namibia
2010s 0.982 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.885 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.097 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2020s 0.8681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.8598 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0083 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Eswatini or Namibia?
Eswatini, at 0.7417 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.681 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Eswatini and Namibia?
0.0607 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Eswatini ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 85th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/namibia/">Eswatini vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,461 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.