Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Singapore

Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.5%
World rank
102nd
of 194 countries
All-time high
663,433 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1984
All-time low
158,345 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2004
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Singapore, 1961–2023

200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Singapore stood at 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The figure is up 3.5% on the previous year and up 16.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Singapore peaked at 663,433 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1984 and was at its lowest, 158,345 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 2004.

That places Singapore 102nd out of 194 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Singapore, year by year

Annual values for Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 294,328 constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 313,284 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.4%
1963 313,582 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.1%
1964 310,746 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.9%
1965 307,910 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.9%
1966 363,284 constant LCU per square kilometre +18.0%
1967 376,866 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.7%
1968 408,358 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.4%
1969 430,746 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.5%
1970 446,866 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.7%
1971 494,328 constant LCU per square kilometre +10.6%
1972 535,224 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.3%
1973 506,418 constant LCU per square kilometre -5.4%
1974 486,269 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.0%
1975 527,910 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.6%
1976 580,149 constant LCU per square kilometre +9.9%
1977 586,269 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.1%
1978 565,075 constant LCU per square kilometre -3.6%
1979 575,970 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.9%
1980 583,433 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.3%
1981 600,298 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.9%
1982 605,970 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.9%
1983 643,731 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.2%
1984 663,433 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
1985 596,567 constant LCU per square kilometre -10.1%
1986 520,746 constant LCU per square kilometre -12.7%
1987 476,716 constant LCU per square kilometre -8.5%
1988 405,075 constant LCU per square kilometre -15.0%
1989 386,119 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.7%
1990 354,478 constant LCU per square kilometre -8.2%
1991 324,925 constant LCU per square kilometre -8.3%
1992 310,149 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.5%
1993 296,866 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.3%
1994 306,418 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.2%
1995 291,343 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.9%
1996 300,448 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
1997 293,134 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.4%
1998 264,478 constant LCU per square kilometre -9.8%
1999 261,791 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.0%
2000 246,119 constant LCU per square kilometre -6.0%
2001 214,478 constant LCU per square kilometre -12.9%
2002 176,296 constant LCU per square kilometre -17.8%
2003 158,806 constant LCU per square kilometre -9.9%
2004 158,345 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.3%
2005 169,231 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.9%
2006 170,893 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.0%
2007 170,647 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.1%
2008 159,571 constant LCU per square kilometre -6.5%
2009 165,714 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.8%
2010 169,801 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
2011 176,420 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.9%
2012 183,569 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.1%
2013 189,816 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.4%
2014 195,487 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.0%
2015 194,781 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.4%
2016 193,512 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.7%
2017 198,736 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.7%
2018 204,342 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.8%
2019 217,737 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.6%
2020 208,357 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.3%
2021 230,780 constant LCU per square kilometre +10.8%
2022 213,649 constant LCU per square kilometre -7.4%
2023 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.5%

Singapore compared with similar countries

  • Singapore's 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 70,895 constant LCU per square kilometre, 3.1× the median. (67 countries reporting)
  • Singapore's 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 289,082 constant LCU per square kilometre, 76% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 346,567 constant LCU per square kilometre 294,328 constant LCU per square kilometre 430,746 constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 530,448 constant LCU per square kilometre 446,866 constant LCU per square kilometre 586,269 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 548,209 constant LCU per square kilometre 386,119 constant LCU per square kilometre 663,433 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 300,403 constant LCU per square kilometre 261,791 constant LCU per square kilometre 354,478 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 179,010 constant LCU per square kilometre 158,345 constant LCU per square kilometre 246,119 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 192,420 constant LCU per square kilometre 169,801 constant LCU per square kilometre 217,737 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 218,454 constant LCU per square kilometre 208,357 constant LCU per square kilometre 230,780 constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Singapore

  1. 99 Nicaragua 239,191 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 100 Russia 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 101 Eswatini 224,342 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 103 Marshall Islands 207,091 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 104 Antigua and Barbuda 206,477 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 105 United Arab Emirates 180,084 constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 195 places →

More economy & growth data for Singapore

All data for Singapore →

Frequently asked questions

What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Singapore?
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Singapore was 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Singapore?
The highest recorded value was 663,433 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1984.
What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Singapore?
The lowest recorded value was 158,345 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2004.
How does Singapore rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Singapore ranks 102nd out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Singapore?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Singapore data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Singapore. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/">Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Singapore</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.