Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Russia
Russia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Russia, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Russia recorded 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 23.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Russia peaked at 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 108,599 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1998.
That places Russia 100th out of 194 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Russia, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 177,184 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 170,136 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1994 | 149,765 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1995 | 137,808 constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1996 | 130,507 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1997 | 133,765 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 108,599 constant LCU per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1999 | 127,114 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2000 | 143,320 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2001 | 159,666 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2002 | 164,300 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 161,357 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2004 | 163,027 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 162,781 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2006 | 166,892 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2007 | 168,425 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 178,082 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2009 | 181,075 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2010 | 159,380 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2011 | 182,032 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2012 | 179,408 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2013 | 186,439 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2014 | 191,722 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2015 | 197,245 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 200,761 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 203,759 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2018 | 207,238 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2019 | 214,400 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2020 | 214,778 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 215,737 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 230,726 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2023 | 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.1% |
Russia compared with similar countries
- Russia's 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 70,895 constant LCU per square kilometre, 3.3× the median. (67 countries reporting)
- Russia's 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 67,376 constant LCU per square kilometre, 3.4× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 141,860 constant LCU per square kilometre | 108,599 constant LCU per square kilometre | 177,184 constant LCU per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 164,892 constant LCU per square kilometre | 143,320 constant LCU per square kilometre | 181,075 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 192,238 constant LCU per square kilometre | 159,380 constant LCU per square kilometre | 214,400 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 223,031 constant LCU per square kilometre | 214,778 constant LCU per square kilometre | 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Russia
- 97 Morocco 256,628 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 98 Sao Tome and Principe 253,090 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 99 Nicaragua 239,191 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 101 Eswatini 224,342 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 102 Singapore 221,031 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 103 Marshall Islands 207,091 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Russia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.25 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 10.58 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0041 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 73.7 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 22.93 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 345.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.009 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 159.78 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 1.87 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Russia?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Russia was 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was 230,884 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was 108,599 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Russia rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Russia ranks 100th out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.